Digital Invades privacy

Fellow bloggers

In the recent times that too in a short time we have witnessed 3 cases of digital invasion of privacy, Kareena-shahid, trisha, DPS school. So where is the digital evolution is driving us? is still a billion dollor question for many of the non-tech savy people. As techies understand that this is scientific advancement of the world and like any other has its own pros and cons. Should we really show our back against this digital evolution. My answer would be "NO", its just that we should make sure the right people get the right technology. I am sure that DPS school case is a severe lack of parental guidance, do a school ***KID*** ever require a mobile phone that too with a camera..parents may be rich and ready to throw money but not at the wrong hands at the wrong time. I would ban mobile usage under 18, its just that they need to grow to handle this evolution of science. Coming to second case of kareena-shahid(assuming that its real) its a problem with the people involved in the act, don't they have home to do all this lustful jobs, more than the digital camera's invasion of kareena's privacy I would say that kareena has invaded public by doing this in a public place, they should be warned first for public nuisance case. Trisha's case is still not clear whether its a marketing stunt or mischieve act of a person...but there are many suspicious questions in it....so its the people who mishandle the digital technologies evolution and not the tech. which invades privacy....its the lust minded people.